The World According to Keitho

Just another weblog

A different take on the Melo trade

Posted by keithosaunders on February 27, 2011

A few days ago I posted about the Carmelo Anthony trade, saying that the Knicks had mortgaged their future.  Shortly after posting I received a great rebuttal from Sherm, whose blog is called The Widening Geier. 

Mortgaged their future? I think you have it exactly backwards. This was about getting another bona fide scorer to build around in the future irrespective of the needs of this year’s team. True, this year’s team can’t rebound or play defense, but they’ll try to compliment Melo and Amar’e with guys who can over the next couple of years. Trading away young players and sacrificing cap space for guys who would fill the holes in this year’s team (rebounding and defense) would have been mortgaging the future. Clearly, the plan is to save cap space to add either Chris Paul or Deron Williams after next season and then get some cheap role players to defend and rebound. And lets not forget that Melo is a premier rebounding small forward as well.

The only player of any value they gave up was Gallinari. Chandler is a restricted FA at the end of the year and they were not going to waste cap space resigning him. Randolph has no offensive game at all. Mozgov was a project with terrible hands. Felton is a nice player, but a dime a dozen point guard and only under contract for one more year (same as Billips). They gave Felton two years knowing that Paul and Williams would be free agents after 2011-12 season.

Sherm makes a great point about Melo’s rebounding — in his Knicks debut he pulled down 10 boards versus the Bucks.  This to go along with his team-high 27 points.  Another great point is that after years of being saddled with salary-cap restrictions, the Knicks are finally in a position of having room to sign star players.  Clearly they will be able to augment this lineup in the offseason.

My problem with this team continues to be the coach — Mike D’antoni —  who is content to live and die by the three-point shot.  No matter how many great shooting forwards or point guards that the Knicks add, I cannot see them winning more than one round of playoffs playing the level of D that we have grown accustomed to under D’antoni.


8 Responses to “A different take on the Melo trade”

  1. nrestivo said

    the Knicks needed someone, they gave up an inconsistent gallinari (melo is a guaranteed 20+ a night. You never know what you’re getting out of Galinari. Chandler would’ve been unsignable this summer, and losing a first round pick isn’t a big deal. They have a solid PG in billups who has a ring and a finals mvp. I’m with you, D’antoni isn’t proven, I’m not sold on him.

    • Until I see them sign defensive minded players who can bound I am dubious. That’s not to say that won’t happen, just that replacing offense with an another offensive player (albeit an elite one) is not going to get them over the hump. That said, it’s great to be having this discussion after years of futility!

  2. Sherm said

    The Widening Geier is my nephew’s blog. I stumbled across you while commenting there.

    And the Knicks are signing Jared Jeffries tonight. While he might not have the muscle the Knicks need, he can defend. In any event, this is the first time there has been a reason to care about the Knicks since Van Gundy left, and I’ll be going to my first Knick game in a decade tomorrow night with tickets purchased below face value back in December when the Knicks first started playing well.

  3. Ten rebounds…BUT…against the Bucks…Milwaukee isn’t a very good rebounding team


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: